CASSADY v. HALL, 5:14-CV-25 (MTT). (2018)
Court: District Court, M.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20180205b10
Visitors: 8
Filed: Feb. 02, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 02, 2018
Summary: ORDER MARC T. TREADWELL , District Judge . United States Magistrate Judge Stephen Hyles recommends denying the Plaintiff's motion for garnishment (Doc. 68). Doc. 84. The Plaintiff has objected to the Recommendation. Docs. 85; 94. 1 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1), the Court has considered the Plaintiff's objections and has made a de novo determination of the portions of the Recommendation to which the Plaintiff objects. The Court has reviewed the Recommendation and accepts the findings,
Summary: ORDER MARC T. TREADWELL , District Judge . United States Magistrate Judge Stephen Hyles recommends denying the Plaintiff's motion for garnishment (Doc. 68). Doc. 84. The Plaintiff has objected to the Recommendation. Docs. 85; 94. 1 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1), the Court has considered the Plaintiff's objections and has made a de novo determination of the portions of the Recommendation to which the Plaintiff objects. The Court has reviewed the Recommendation and accepts the findings, ..
More
ORDER
MARC T. TREADWELL, District Judge.
United States Magistrate Judge Stephen Hyles recommends denying the Plaintiff's motion for garnishment (Doc. 68). Doc. 84. The Plaintiff has objected to the Recommendation. Docs. 85; 94.1 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the Court has considered the Plaintiff's objections and has made a de novo determination of the portions of the Recommendation to which the Plaintiff objects. The Court has reviewed the Recommendation and accepts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, the Recommendation is ADOPTED and made the order of this Court, and the motion for garnishment (Doc. 68) is DENIED.
SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. The Magistrate Judge originally erroneously styled his Recommendation an Order. Doc. 84. The Plaintiff noticed appeal, and the Eleventh Circuit dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation had not been rendered final by the Court. Docs. 88; 93.
Source: Leagle
