Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

GILYARD v. McLAUGHLIN, 5:14-CV-185 (MTT). (2014)

Court: District Court, M.D. Georgia Number: infdco20140815g27 Visitors: 10
Filed: Aug. 06, 2014
Latest Update: Aug. 06, 2014
Summary: ORDER MARC T. TREADWELL, District Judge. Before the Court is the Order & Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Stephen Hyles. (Doc. 11). Following a preliminary screening of this case pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A, the Magistrate Judge recommends the Court dismiss all of the Plaintiff's claims except for his due process claims against Defendants Bostick and Bobbitt and his First Amendment retaliation claim against Defendant Bobbitt. The Plaintiff has filed an objection to the Magistrate Judge's
More

ORDER

MARC T. TREADWELL, District Judge.

Before the Court is the Order & Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Stephen Hyles. (Doc. 11). Following a preliminary screening of this case pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, the Magistrate Judge recommends the Court dismiss all of the Plaintiff's claims except for his due process claims against Defendants Bostick and Bobbitt and his First Amendment retaliation claim against Defendant Bobbitt.

The Plaintiff has filed an objection to the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation. (Docs. 14). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the Court has considered the Plaintiff's objection and made a de novo determination of the portions of the Recommendation to which the Plaintiff objects. The Recommendation is ADOPTED and made the ORDER of the Court. The Plaintiff's due process and First Amendment retaliation claims against Defendants Bostick and Bobbitt will go forward as ordered by the Magistrate Judge. All other claims and Defendants are dismissed without prejudice.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer