HOWE v. GODINEZ, 14-cv-844-SMY-PMF. (2014)
Court: District Court, S.D. Illinois
Number: infdco20141203a41
Visitors: 14
Filed: Dec. 02, 2014
Latest Update: Dec. 02, 2014
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER STACI M. YANDLE, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation ("R & R") (Doc. 35) of Magistrate Judge Philip M. Frazier recommending this Court deny Plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction (Doc. 32). The Court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations of the magistrate judge in a report and recommendation. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). The Court must review de novo the portions of the re
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER STACI M. YANDLE, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation ("R & R") (Doc. 35) of Magistrate Judge Philip M. Frazier recommending this Court deny Plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction (Doc. 32). The Court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations of the magistrate judge in a report and recommendation. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). The Court must review de novo the portions of the rep..
More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
STACI M. YANDLE, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation ("R & R") (Doc. 35) of Magistrate Judge Philip M. Frazier recommending this Court deny Plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction (Doc. 32).
The Court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations of the magistrate judge in a report and recommendation. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). The Court must review de novo the portions of the report to which objections are made. The Court has discretion to conduct a new hearing and may consider the record before the magistrate judge anew or receive any further evidence deemed necessary. Id. "If no objection or only partial objection is made, the district court judge reviews those unobjected portions for clear error." Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999).
The Court has received no objection to the R & R. The Court has reviewed the entire file and finds that the R & R is not clearly erroneous. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the R & R (Doc. 35) and DENIES Plaintiffs' motions for a preliminary injunction (Doc. 32).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
