Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Geddis, 8:19-cr-56-T-17AEP. (2019)

Court: District Court, M.D. Florida Number: infdco20191029g50 Visitors: 12
Filed: Oct. 22, 2019
Latest Update: Oct. 22, 2019
Summary: PRELIMINARY ORDER OF FORFEITURE ELIZABETH A. KOVACHEVICH , District Judge . The defendant pleaded guilty to, and was adjudged guilty of, the offenses charged in counts one through three of the indictment — violations of 18 U.S.C. 2251(a) and 2252(a)(4)(B). The United States moves (Doc.), under 18 U.S.C. 2253 and Rule 32.2(b)(2), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, for a preliminary order forfeiting the defendant's interest in the following assets: 1. An iPhone 4S, serial number DNP
More

PRELIMINARY ORDER OF FORFEITURE

The defendant pleaded guilty to, and was adjudged guilty of, the offenses charged in counts one through three of the indictment — violations of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2251(a) and 2252(a)(4)(B).

The United States moves (Doc.), under 18 U.S.C. § 2253 and Rule 32.2(b)(2), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, for a preliminary order forfeiting the defendant's interest in the following assets:

1. An iPhone 4S, serial number DNPGTJH9DT9U; 2. A Toshiba hard drive, serial number 52K3T2PETTS8; and 3. A Seagate Backup Plus for MAC Portable Drive, serial number NA7XEAQM.

The United States has established the requisite connection between the assets and the offenses charged in counts one through three of the indictment. Because the United States is entitled to possession of the assets, the motion is GRANTED. The defendant's interest in the assets is condemned and forfeited to the United States for disposition according to law, subject to the provisions of 21 U.S.C. § 853(n), as incorporated by 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c).

Jurisdiction is retained to the extent necessary to complete the forfeiture and disposition of the assets.

ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer