Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

WHITE v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, A17D0501. (2017)

Court: Court of Appeals of Georgia Number: ingaco20170712291 Visitors: 6
Filed: Jul. 12, 2017
Latest Update: Jul. 12, 2017
Summary: Order Inmate Hubert White seeks discretionary review of a Monroe County Superior Court order granting him pauper status to file his petition for mandamus against the Department of Corrections and directing the clerk of that court to file the petition and transfer the case to Fulton County. 1 We, however, lack jurisdiction. To the extent White seeks mandamus relief compelling service of process on the Department of Corrections, he must first present his request to the superior court. "General
More

Order

Inmate Hubert White seeks discretionary review of a Monroe County Superior Court order granting him pauper status to file his petition for mandamus against the Department of Corrections and directing the clerk of that court to file the petition and transfer the case to Fulton County.1 We, however, lack jurisdiction.

To the extent White seeks mandamus relief compelling service of process on the Department of Corrections, he must first present his request to the superior court. "Generally, the superior courts of this state have the power, in proper cases, to issue process in the nature of mandamus, prohibition, specific performance, quo warranto, and injunction, and hence the need to resort to the appellate courts for such relief by petition filed in the appellate courts will be extremely rare." Brown v. Johnson, 251 Ga. 436, 436 (306 S.E.2d 655) (1983). This is not one of the extremely rare instances in which this Court will exercise original mandamus jurisdiction. See Gay v. Owens, 292 Ga. 480, 483 (2) (738 S.E.2d 614) (2013). Until such time as White has pursued relief in superior court and obtained a ruling thereon, there is no basis for this Court to exercise jurisdiction.

To the extent White seeks immediate clarification of the venue issue, his appeal is premature because the case remains pending in superior court. See In the Interest of W. L., 335 Ga.App. 561, 561-562 (782 S.E.2d 464) (2016). Transfer orders generally are not appealable orders because a case transferred from one trial court to another trial court is still "pending in the court below." Id. Therefore, to the extent that White challenges the decision to transfer the case to Fulton County, he was required to comply with the interlocutory appeal procedures of OCGA § 5-6-34 (b), which include obtaining a certificate of immediate review from the trial court. The failure to do so mandates the dismissal of this appeal.

For the foregoing reasons, this application for discretionary appeal is hereby dismissed.

FootNotes


1. White filed his application in the Supreme Court, which transferred the case to this Court.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer