SPURLOCK v. COMMISSINER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 1:14cv990. (2015)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20151229951
Visitors: 5
Filed: Dec. 28, 2015
Latest Update: Dec. 28, 2015
Summary: ORDER SUSAN J. DLOTT , District Judge . The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz filed on November 23, 2015 (Doc. 16), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) expired December 10, 2015, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, the decision of the Commissioner is
Summary: ORDER SUSAN J. DLOTT , District Judge . The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz filed on November 23, 2015 (Doc. 16), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) expired December 10, 2015, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, the decision of the Commissioner is ..
More
ORDER
SUSAN J. DLOTT, District Judge.
The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz filed on November 23, 2015 (Doc. 16), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) expired December 10, 2015, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendation.
Accordingly, the decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. §405 (g).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle