Lineberger v. CBS Corporation, 1:16 cv 390. (2018)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20180104c79
Visitors: 9
Filed: Jan. 03, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 03, 2018
Summary: ORDER DENNIS L. HOWELL , Magistrate Judge . Pending before the Court is the Motion to Stay [# 149]. While labeled a "Consent Motion to Stay Proceedings," Plaintiffs' counsel has not shown that consultation with defendants has occurred. See LCvR 7.1(b) . Further, Plaintiffs' counsel has not filed a brief as required by LCvR 7.1(c). Therefore, the Court DISMISSES the motion without prejudice [# 149]. Plaintiffs' counsel is DIRECTED to refile the motion—stating if the parties have confer
Summary: ORDER DENNIS L. HOWELL , Magistrate Judge . Pending before the Court is the Motion to Stay [# 149]. While labeled a "Consent Motion to Stay Proceedings," Plaintiffs' counsel has not shown that consultation with defendants has occurred. See LCvR 7.1(b) . Further, Plaintiffs' counsel has not filed a brief as required by LCvR 7.1(c). Therefore, the Court DISMISSES the motion without prejudice [# 149]. Plaintiffs' counsel is DIRECTED to refile the motion—stating if the parties have conferr..
More
ORDER
DENNIS L. HOWELL, Magistrate Judge.
Pending before the Court is the Motion to Stay [# 149]. While labeled a "Consent Motion to Stay Proceedings," Plaintiffs' counsel has not shown that consultation with defendants has occurred. See LCvR 7.1(b). Further, Plaintiffs' counsel has not filed a brief as required by LCvR 7.1(c).
Therefore, the Court DISMISSES the motion without prejudice [# 149]. Plaintiffs' counsel is DIRECTED to refile the motion—stating if the parties have conferred and stating opposing counsel's position(s). Contemporaneously and separately from the motion, Plaintiffs' counsel must file a brief.
Source: Leagle
