Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

ELIA v. POWELL, 3:11-CV-466. (2012)

Court: District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania Number: infdco20120323c66 Visitors: 11
Filed: Mar. 21, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 21, 2012
Summary: MEMORANDUM A. RICHARD CAPUTO, District Judge. On February 27, 2012, I issued an order that, among other things, dismissed Plaintiff's 1983, civil conspiracy, and false imprisonment claims as untimely. I dismissed the claims on the grounds that they had been filed more than two years after the equitable tolling date for the statute of limitations, and thus they were untimely. Upon further consideration of the statute of limitations, I now determine that Plaintiff's claims fall under the Am
More

MEMORANDUM

A. RICHARD CAPUTO, District Judge.

On February 27, 2012, I issued an order that, among other things, dismissed Plaintiff's § 1983, civil conspiracy, and false imprisonment claims as untimely. I dismissed the claims on the grounds that they had been filed more than two years after the equitable tolling date for the statute of limitations, and thus they were untimely.

Upon further consideration of the statute of limitations, I now determine that Plaintiff's claims fall under the American Pipe tolling doctrine. Under that doctrine, "the commencement of a class action suspends the applicable statute of limitations to all asserted members of the class who would have been parties had the suit been permitted to continue as a class action." American Pipe & Construction Co. v. Utah, 414 U.S. 538, 554 (1974).1 On February 13, 2009, various plaintiffs filed a class action suit arising out of the alleged conspiracy at issue in this case. See Conway v. Conahan, No. 3:09-cv-0291, later consolidated as Wallace v. Powell, 3:09-cv-0286. The putative class includes juveniles incarcerated by Defendant Mark Ciavarella and their parents who incurred damages. Plaintiff here, who was a juvenile incarcerated by Mr. Ciavarella, falls within that class. Therefore, the statute of limitations on his § 1983 and state tort claims was tolled pursuant to American Pipe upon the filing of the class action suit in Wallace v. Powell.

For this reason, Plaintiff's claims were not untimely and the order dismissing his claims will be vacated. An appropriate order follows.

FootNotes


1. There is a circuit split as to whether American Pipe tolling applies in situations such as here where class certification has not yet been denied. For the reasons noted in my March xx order in Wallace v. Powell, No. 3:09-cv-0286, I hold that the tolling doctrine does apply.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer