ROSENBERG v. DVI RECEIVABLES, XIV, LLC, 14-5608. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20150605d01
Visitors: 12
Filed: Jun. 04, 2015
Latest Update: Jun. 04, 2015
Summary: ORDER CYNTHIA M. RUFE , District Judge . AND NOW, this 4th day of June 2015, upon consideration of Defendants' motion to dismiss [Doc. No. 4] and Plaintiffs' responses in opposition thereto, and for the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED as follows: the Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE because the tortious interference claim asserted is preempted by 11 U.S.C. 303(i). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of
Summary: ORDER CYNTHIA M. RUFE , District Judge . AND NOW, this 4th day of June 2015, upon consideration of Defendants' motion to dismiss [Doc. No. 4] and Plaintiffs' responses in opposition thereto, and for the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED as follows: the Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE because the tortious interference claim asserted is preempted by 11 U.S.C. 303(i). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of C..
More
ORDER
CYNTHIA M. RUFE, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 4th day of June 2015, upon consideration of Defendants' motion to dismiss [Doc. No. 4] and Plaintiffs' responses in opposition thereto, and for the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED as follows: the Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE because the tortious interference claim asserted is preempted by 11 U.S.C. § 303(i). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall CLOSE this case.
It is so ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
