Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Fracasse v. Equifax Information Services LLC, 5:18-cv-635-Oc-PRL. (2019)

Court: District Court, M.D. Florida Number: infdco20191018a20 Visitors: 5
Filed: Oct. 17, 2019
Latest Update: Oct. 17, 2019
Summary: ORDER PHILIP R. LAMMENS , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the Court on the motion to quash filed by third-party Tabatha Hendrickson. (Doc. 33). The Court previously granted a protective order as to the September 24, 2019 deposition of Ms. Hendrickson because it was set without adequate notice. (Doc. 29). The Court is unaware of any other subpoena directed to Ms. Hendrickson so there is nothing for the Court to quash at this time. Accordingly, Ms. Hendrickson's motion (Doc. 33) is d
More

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the motion to quash filed by third-party Tabatha Hendrickson. (Doc. 33). The Court previously granted a protective order as to the September 24, 2019 deposition of Ms. Hendrickson because it was set without adequate notice. (Doc. 29). The Court is unaware of any other subpoena directed to Ms. Hendrickson so there is nothing for the Court to quash at this time. Accordingly, Ms. Hendrickson's motion (Doc. 33) is due to be denied. Ms. Hendrickson is cautioned that if she wishes to challenge a subsequent subpoena, she must file her motion in the district where compliance with the subpoena is required. See Fed.R. Civ. P. 45(d)(3).1

DONE and ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. For example, if a future subpoena required Ms. Hendrickson to appear for deposition in Las Vegas, Nevada, she would file her motion with the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer