Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. JETT, 06-30060. (2012)

Court: District Court, C.D. Illinois Number: infdco20120106873 Visitors: 16
Filed: Jan. 04, 2012
Latest Update: Jan. 04, 2012
Summary: OPINION SUE E. MYERSCOUGH, District Judge. This Court now considers the Amended Motion to Reduce Sentence, to which the United States Probation Office and the United States Attorney's Office have no objection. See d/e 69. For the reasons stated therein, the Amended Motion to Reduce Sentence (d/e 69) is GRANTED. An Amended Judgment will be entered with a sentence of 168 months' imprisonment. The Motion to Reduce Sentence filed October 19, 2011 (d/e 67) is DENIED AS MOOT. IT IS SO ORDERED.

OPINION

SUE E. MYERSCOUGH, District Judge.

This Court now considers the Amended Motion to Reduce Sentence, to which the United States Probation Office and the United States Attorney's Office have no objection. See d/e 69. For the reasons stated therein, the Amended Motion to Reduce Sentence (d/e 69) is GRANTED. An Amended Judgment will be entered with a sentence of 168 months' imprisonment. The Motion to Reduce Sentence filed October 19, 2011 (d/e 67) is DENIED AS MOOT.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer