Adams v. Commissioner of Social Security, 1:17-cv-358. (2017)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20180215g91
Visitors: 24
Filed: Dec. 29, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 29, 2017
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION KAREN L. LITKOVITZ , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the Court on the parties' joint motion to remand this case for further administrative proceedings pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g) and to enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff. (Doc. 10). Pursuant to the parties' agreement, upon remand, "the Appeals Council will vacate all findings in the Administrative Law Judge's decision and will develop the administrative record as necessary to determin
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION KAREN L. LITKOVITZ , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the Court on the parties' joint motion to remand this case for further administrative proceedings pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g) and to enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff. (Doc. 10). Pursuant to the parties' agreement, upon remand, "the Appeals Council will vacate all findings in the Administrative Law Judge's decision and will develop the administrative record as necessary to determine..
More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
KAREN L. LITKOVITZ, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the parties' joint motion to remand this case for further administrative proceedings pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and to enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff. (Doc. 10). Pursuant to the parties' agreement, upon remand, "the Appeals Council will vacate all findings in the Administrative Law Judge's decision and will develop the administrative record as necessary to determine whether Plaintiff is disabled within the meaning of the Social Security Act." (Id. at 1). Further, "[a]s part of his/her new decision, the ALJ will reweigh/reconsider the medical opinion evidence of record." (Id.).
It is therefore RECOMMENDED that the parties' joint motion to remand (Doc. 10) be GRANTED, judgment be entered in plaintiff's favor, and that this case be REMANDED to the Commissioner of Social Security for further administrative proceedings pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
IT IS SO RECOMMENDED.
Source: Leagle
