U.S., STUART C. IRBY COMPANY v. EASTWAY ELECTRIC, LLC, 4:14-CV-47 (CDL). (2014)
Court: District Court, M.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20140801f75
Visitors: 3
Filed: Jul. 30, 2014
Latest Update: Jul. 30, 2014
Summary: ORDER CLAY D. LAND, District Judge. Plaintiff Stuart C. Irby Company asserted claims against Defendant Eastway Electric, LLC for failure to satisfy its obligations to Irby under a Miller Act payment bond. Eastway did not respond to the Complaint or otherwise defend this action, and the Court entered a default judgment in Irby's favor and against Eastway (ECF No. 21). Now, Irby seeks an award of attorneys' fees and costs, which are authorized by its contract with Eastway and which the Court fin
Summary: ORDER CLAY D. LAND, District Judge. Plaintiff Stuart C. Irby Company asserted claims against Defendant Eastway Electric, LLC for failure to satisfy its obligations to Irby under a Miller Act payment bond. Eastway did not respond to the Complaint or otherwise defend this action, and the Court entered a default judgment in Irby's favor and against Eastway (ECF No. 21). Now, Irby seeks an award of attorneys' fees and costs, which are authorized by its contract with Eastway and which the Court find..
More
ORDER
CLAY D. LAND, District Judge.
Plaintiff Stuart C. Irby Company asserted claims against Defendant Eastway Electric, LLC for failure to satisfy its obligations to Irby under a Miller Act payment bond. Eastway did not respond to the Complaint or otherwise defend this action, and the Court entered a default judgment in Irby's favor and against Eastway (ECF No. 21). Now, Irby seeks an award of attorneys' fees and costs, which are authorized by its contract with Eastway and which the Court finds are reasonable. Eastway did not respond to the motion. Irby's motion for attorney's fees and costs (ECF No. 23) is granted. Irby is hereby awarded attorneys' fees of $6,650.00 and litigation costs of $801.84 against Eastway.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle