BURGESS v. COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION, 13-1344. (2013)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20130718101
Visitors: 10
Filed: Jul. 18, 2013
Latest Update: Jul. 18, 2013
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM. Henry M. Burgess, Jr. appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary judgment to the Defendant in his civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Burgess v. Costco Wholesale, No. 4:10-cv-01678-RBH (D.S.C. Feb. 21, 2013). We dispense with oral
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM. Henry M. Burgess, Jr. appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary judgment to the Defendant in his civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Burgess v. Costco Wholesale, No. 4:10-cv-01678-RBH (D.S.C. Feb. 21, 2013). We dispense with oral ..
More
UNPUBLISHED
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM.
Henry M. Burgess, Jr. appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary judgment to the Defendant in his civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Burgess v. Costco Wholesale, No. 4:10-cv-01678-RBH (D.S.C. Feb. 21, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
