Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

McKEE v. AT&T MOBILITY CORPORATION, 1:13-CV-0036-WSD-ECS. (2013)

Court: District Court, N.D. Georgia Number: infdco20130730d77 Visitors: 7
Filed: Jul. 09, 2013
Latest Update: Jul. 09, 2013
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE CLAYTON SCOFIELD, III, Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the Court on the parties' joint motion to substitute AT&T Mobility Services, LLC for the incorrectly named corporate defendant. [Doc. 10]. The parties represent that, at all times relevant to the allegations in the complaint, AT&T Mobility Services, LLC was Plaintiff's employer and not AT&T Mobility Corporation. [ Id. ]. Upon consideration, IT IS RECOMMENDED that the p
More

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

CLAYTON SCOFIELD, III, Magistrate Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the parties' joint motion to substitute AT&T Mobility Services, LLC for the incorrectly named corporate defendant. [Doc. 10]. The parties represent that, at all times relevant to the allegations in the complaint, AT&T Mobility Services, LLC was Plaintiff's employer and not AT&T Mobility Corporation. [Id.].

Upon consideration, IT IS RECOMMENDED that the parties' joint motion, [Doc. 10], be GRANTED. The undersigned RECOMMENDS that all claims against AT&T Mobility Corporation be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and that AT&T Mobility Services, LLC be substituted in its place as the Defendant. If the district judge adopts this report and recommendation, pleadings already filed need not be resubmitted to reflect this substitution, but the caption for papers filed hereafter shall reflect the change.

SO REPORTED AND RECOMMENDED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer