Filed: Jun. 25, 2013
Latest Update: Jun. 25, 2013
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 19) AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. 11) AND DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. 17) AND REMANDING MATTER FOR FURTHER ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS AVERN COHN, District Judge. I. This is a social security case. Plaintiff Anna M. Johnson appeals from the final determination of the Commissioner of Social Security (Commissioner) that she is not disabled and therefore not entitled
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 19) AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. 11) AND DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. 17) AND REMANDING MATTER FOR FURTHER ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS AVERN COHN, District Judge. I. This is a social security case. Plaintiff Anna M. Johnson appeals from the final determination of the Commissioner of Social Security (Commissioner) that she is not disabled and therefore not entitled t..
More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 19) AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. 11) AND DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. 17) AND REMANDING MATTER FOR FURTHER ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS
AVERN COHN, District Judge.
I.
This is a social security case. Plaintiff Anna M. Johnson appeals from the final determination of the Commissioner of Social Security (Commissioner) that she is not disabled and therefore not entitled to disability insurance benefits. The matter was referred to a magistrate judge for all pretrial proceedings. Plaintiff and the Commissioner filed cross motions for summary judgment. Plaintiff requested that the Commissioner's decision be reversed and benefits awarded, or that the matter be remanded for further proceedings.
The magistrate judge issued a report and recommendation (MJRR), recommending that plaintiff's motion be granted as to a remand and the
Commissioner's motion be denied. Specifically, the magistrate judge recommends that the matter be remanded under sentence four1 to the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) for a hearing at which "the ALJ should be required to provide the VE with a sufficiently detailed hypothetical under which to determine whether Plaintiff could perform her past relevant work." MJRR at p. 17.
II.
Neither party has filed objections to the MJRR and the time for filing objections has passed. The failure to file objections to the report and recommendation waives any further right to appeal. Smith v. Detroit Federation of Teachers Local 231, 829 F.2d 1370, 1373 (6th Cir.1987). Likewise, the failure to object to the magistrate judge's report releases the Court from its duty to independently review the motions. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985).
However, the Court has reviewed the MJRR and agrees with the magistrate judge. Accordingly, the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge are ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of the Court. Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The Commissioner's motion for summary judgment is DENIED.
This matter is REMANDED for further administrative proceedings consistent with the MJRR.
SO ORDERED.
