WARSINSKI v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 13-14136. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20141210b65
Visitors: 10
Filed: Dec. 09, 2014
Latest Update: Dec. 09, 2014
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [25], GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [22], AND DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [17] NANCY G. EDMUNDS, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 25]. Being fully advised in the premises and having reviewed the record and the pleadings, including the Report and Recommendation, 1 in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1),
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [25], GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [22], AND DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [17] NANCY G. EDMUNDS, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 25]. Being fully advised in the premises and having reviewed the record and the pleadings, including the Report and Recommendation, 1 in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1), ..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [25], GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [22], AND DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [17]
NANCY G. EDMUNDS, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 25]. Being fully advised in the premises and having reviewed the record and the pleadings, including the Report and Recommendation,1 in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the Court hereby ACCEPTS AND ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. It is further ordered that Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment [ECF No. 22] is DENIED, Defendant's motion for summary judgment [ECF No. 18] is GRANTED, the findings of the Commissioner are AFFIRMED, and the case is hereby DISMISSED.
SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. Timely objections were not filed.
Source: Leagle
