STILLION v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 2:14-cv-17. (2014)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20141222b35
Visitors: 2
Filed: Dec. 19, 2014
Latest Update: Dec. 19, 2014
Summary: ORDER PETER C. ECONOMUS, District Judge. This matter is before the Court for consideration of the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, in which the Magistrate Judge recommended that Plaintiff's statement of errors be sustained in part and remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 405(g), sentence four. (Doc. 19.) The Report and Recommendation specifically advised the parties that failure to object to the Report and Recommendation within fourtee
Summary: ORDER PETER C. ECONOMUS, District Judge. This matter is before the Court for consideration of the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, in which the Magistrate Judge recommended that Plaintiff's statement of errors be sustained in part and remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 405(g), sentence four. (Doc. 19.) The Report and Recommendation specifically advised the parties that failure to object to the Report and Recommendation within fourteen..
More
ORDER
PETER C. ECONOMUS, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court for consideration of the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, in which the Magistrate Judge recommended that Plaintiff's statement of errors be sustained in part and remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), sentence four. (Doc. 19.)
The Report and Recommendation specifically advised the parties that failure to object to the Report and Recommendation within fourteen days results in a "waiver of the right to have the district judge review the Report and Recommendation de novo, and also operates as a waiver of the right to appeal the decision of the District Court adopting the Report and Recommendation." (Report & Recommendation 16-17, Doc. 19.) The time period for filing objections to the Report and Recommendation has expired. No party has objected to the Report and Recommendation.
The Court reviewed the Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). Noting that no objections have been filed and that the time for filing such objections has expired, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation and SUSTAINS Plaintiff's statement of errors to the extent that this case is hereby REMANDED to the Commissioner for further proceedings pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), sentence four. (Doc. 19.)
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
