GREEN TREE SERVICING, LLC v. COOK, 14-cv-00107-JPG-DGW. (2014)
Court: District Court, S.D. Illinois
Number: infdco20141126e19
Visitors: 11
Filed: Nov. 25, 2014
Latest Update: Nov. 25, 2014
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER J. PHIL GILBERT, District Judge. This matter comes before the court on the Report and Recommendation ("R & R") (Doc. 32) of Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson with regard to Defendants' Motion (Doc. 11) for Sanctions pursuant to Rule 11 filed by Defendants Harmon Cook and Pamela Cook. There were no objections to the R & R filed by either the Plaintiff or any of the defendants. The Court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER J. PHIL GILBERT, District Judge. This matter comes before the court on the Report and Recommendation ("R & R") (Doc. 32) of Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson with regard to Defendants' Motion (Doc. 11) for Sanctions pursuant to Rule 11 filed by Defendants Harmon Cook and Pamela Cook. There were no objections to the R & R filed by either the Plaintiff or any of the defendants. The Court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations o..
More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
J. PHIL GILBERT, District Judge.
This matter comes before the court on the Report and Recommendation ("R & R") (Doc. 32) of Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson with regard to Defendants' Motion (Doc. 11) for Sanctions pursuant to Rule 11 filed by Defendants Harmon Cook and Pamela Cook. There were no objections to the R & R filed by either the Plaintiff or any of the defendants.
The Court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations of the magistrate judge in a report and recommendation. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). The Court must review de novo the portions of the report to which objections are made. The Court has discretion to conduct a new hearing and may consider the record before the magistrate judge anew or receive any further evidence deemed necessary. Id. "If no objection or only partial objection is made, the district court judge reviews those unobjected portions for clear error." Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999).
The Court has received no objection to the Report and Recommendation. The Court has reviewed the entire file and finds that the R & R is not clearly erroneous. Accordingly, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Report in its entirety (Doc. 32) and DENIES Defendant's Motion for Sanctions (Doc. 11).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
