Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

LEE v. GROUNDS, 12-cv-1076-DRH-DGW. (2013)

Court: District Court, S.D. Illinois Number: infdco20130628a76 Visitors: 6
Filed: Jun. 27, 2013
Latest Update: Jun. 27, 2013
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DAVID R. HERNDON, Chief District Judge. Before the Court is respondent's motion to dismiss petitioner's 28 U.S.C. 2254 petition for failure to exhaust state court remedies (Doc. 15). As respondent filed his motion in March, the time allotted for petitioner to respond has long since passed. Accordingly, pursuant to LOCAL RULE 7.1(c), the Court deems petitioner's failure to respond as an admission of the merits of respondent's motion. See SDIL-LR 7.1(c). Thus, responden
More

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

DAVID R. HERNDON, Chief District Judge.

Before the Court is respondent's motion to dismiss petitioner's 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for failure to exhaust state court remedies (Doc. 15). As respondent filed his motion in March, the time allotted for petitioner to respond has long since passed. Accordingly, pursuant to LOCAL RULE 7.1(c), the Court deems petitioner's failure to respond as an admission of the merits of respondent's motion. See SDIL-LR 7.1(c). Thus, respondent's motion is GRANTED (Doc. 15). Petitioner's claims are dismissed without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. Randy Grounds is the warden of Robinson Correctional Center, where petitioner is in custody. As petitioner's physical custodian, Warden Grounds is the only proper respondent in this action. See Habeas Corpus Rule 2(a); Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(d); Bridges v. Chambers, 425 F.3d 1048, 1049-50 (7th Cir. 2005). Accordingly, the Clerk is directed to substitute Grounds for Illinois Department of Corrections as respondent in this action.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer