Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Hardy v. Letavis Enterprises, Inc., 1:18-cv-1077. (2019)

Court: District Court, W.D. Michigan Number: infdco20190905a53 Visitors: 7
Filed: Sep. 04, 2019
Latest Update: Sep. 04, 2019
Summary: ORDER JANET T. NEFF , District Judge . This is a civil action filed by a pro se litigant. Defendants Letavis Enterprises, Inc., TJ Hengstebeck and Matt Ganser filed a Motion to dismiss. On August 14, 2019, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation, recommending that the motion be granted, Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Jane Doe Samantha be dismissed for failure to timely effect service, this matter terminated, and that an appeal of this matter would not be taken in go
More

ORDER

This is a civil action filed by a pro se litigant. Defendants Letavis Enterprises, Inc., TJ Hengstebeck and Matt Ganser filed a Motion to dismiss. On August 14, 2019, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation, recommending that the motion be granted, Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Jane Doe Samantha be dismissed for failure to timely effect service, this matter terminated, and that an appeal of this matter would not be taken in good faith. The Report and Recommendation was duly served. No objections have been filed. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF. No. 30) is APPROVED and ADOPTED as the Opinion of the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants Letavis Enterprises, Inc., TJ Hengstebeck and Matt Ganser's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 26) is GRANTED for the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Jane Doe Samantha are DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to timely effect service.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal of this decision would not be taken in good faith. See McGore v. Wrigglesworth, 114 F.3d 601, 610-11 (6th Cir. 1997), overruled on other grounds by Jones v. Bock, 549 U.S. 199, 206, 211-12 (2007).

A Judgment will be entered consistent with this Order.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer