DENSON v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 13-CV-14338-DT. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20140930d07
Visitors: 2
Filed: Sep. 28, 2014
Latest Update: Sep. 28, 2014
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ROBERT H. CLELAND, District Judge. The case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Patricia T. Morris pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72.1. The magistrate judge issued her report on August 15, 2014 recommending that this court grant Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment, deny Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment and the case be remanded for an award of benefits. No objections have been filed pursuant
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ROBERT H. CLELAND, District Judge. The case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Patricia T. Morris pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72.1. The magistrate judge issued her report on August 15, 2014 recommending that this court grant Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment, deny Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment and the case be remanded for an award of benefits. No objections have been filed pursuant t..
More
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
ROBERT H. CLELAND, District Judge.
The case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Patricia T. Morris pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72.1. The magistrate judge issued her report on August 15, 2014 recommending that this court grant Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment, deny Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment and the case be remanded for an award of benefits. No objections have been filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(C); thus further appeal rights are waived.1
Having reviewed the file and the report, the court determines that the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge are correct and ADOPTS the same for purposes of this order. Therefore,
ORDER
IT IS ORDERED that, for the reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, the Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED, the Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED and the case is REMANDED for an award of benefits.
FootNotes
1. The failure to object to the magistrate judge's report releases the court from its duty to independently review the motion. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140,149 (1985).
Source: Leagle
