Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Buero v. Social Security, Commissioner of, 12-cv-12137. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan Number: infdco20180104b99 Visitors: 22
Filed: Jan. 03, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 03, 2018
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE DATED DECEMBER 7, 2017 (Dkt. 22), AND GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO 42 U.S.C. 406(b)(1) (Dkt. 15) MARK A. GOLDSMITH , District Judge . This matter is presently before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of Magistrate Judge Stephanie Dawkins Davis, issued on December 7, 2017 (Dkt. 22). In the R&R, the Magistrate Judge recommends that the Court grant Plaintiff Suzette
More

ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE DATED DECEMBER 7, 2017 (Dkt. 22), AND GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1) (Dkt. 15)

This matter is presently before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of Magistrate Judge Stephanie Dawkins Davis, issued on December 7, 2017 (Dkt. 22). In the R&R, the Magistrate Judge recommends that the Court grant Plaintiff Suzette Buero's motion for attorney fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1) (Dkt. 15). The parties have not filed objections to the R&R, and the time to do so has expired. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). The Court has reviewed the R&R and concludes that the Magistrate Judge has reached the proper conclusion for the proper reasons. Therefore, the R&R is accepted and adopted as the findings and conclusions of the Court. Accordingly, the Court grants Plaintiff's motion for attorney fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1).

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer