Filed: Jan. 30, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 30, 2019
Summary: ORDER STACI M. YANDLE , District Judge . This case comes before the Court for case management. On March 8, 2017, this matter was set for hearing and speedy trial clock was started for Defendants Lozano and Solis (Doc. 70). Thereafter, the Court took the following actions regarding the trial setting: on August 9, 2017, an Order was entered granting Defendant Shields' Motion to Continue and continuing trial to November 27, 2017 as to all defendants (Doc. 94); on October 16, 2017, an Order wa
Summary: ORDER STACI M. YANDLE , District Judge . This case comes before the Court for case management. On March 8, 2017, this matter was set for hearing and speedy trial clock was started for Defendants Lozano and Solis (Doc. 70). Thereafter, the Court took the following actions regarding the trial setting: on August 9, 2017, an Order was entered granting Defendant Shields' Motion to Continue and continuing trial to November 27, 2017 as to all defendants (Doc. 94); on October 16, 2017, an Order was..
More
ORDER
STACI M. YANDLE, District Judge.
This case comes before the Court for case management. On March 8, 2017, this matter was set for hearing and speedy trial clock was started for Defendants Lozano and Solis (Doc. 70). Thereafter, the Court took the following actions regarding the trial setting: on August 9, 2017, an Order was entered granting Defendant Shields' Motion to Continue and continuing trial to November 27, 2017 as to all defendants (Doc. 94); on October 16, 2017, an Order was entered granting Defendant Shields' Motion to Continue and continuing trial to January 29, 2018 as to all defendants (Doc. 102); on December 20, 2017, an Order was entered granting Defendant Deleon's Motion to Continue and continuing trial to May 14, 2018 as to all defendants (Doc. 117); on April 27, 2018, and Order was entered granting Defendant Solis' Motion to Continue and continuing trial to November 5, 2018 as to all defendants (Doc. 144); on September 14, 2019, an Order was entered granting Defendant Solis' Motion to Continue and continuing trial to March 4, 2019 as to all defendants (Doc. 176).
The Court notes that Defendant Cesar Lozano has not been arraigned and should not have been included in the above-referenced Orders. Therefore, the jury trial setting of March 4, 2019 is VACATED as to Defendant Cesar Lozano. The Court will reset the trial date for Defendant Lozano when he is arraigned.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
