Taylor-Shelton v. Credit Associates, Inc., 6:17-cv-01195-MK. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Oregon
Number: infdco20190405846
Visitors: 3
Filed: Mar. 25, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 25, 2019
Summary: ORDER ANN AIKEN , District Judge . Magistrate Judge Thomas Coffin filed his Findings and Recommendation ("F&R") (doc. 33) recommending that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgement and Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgement be denied. Defendant then timely filed objections to the F&R (doc. 35). The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(l)(B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). When either party objects to any portion of a magistrate judge's F&R, the district court must make a de
Summary: ORDER ANN AIKEN , District Judge . Magistrate Judge Thomas Coffin filed his Findings and Recommendation ("F&R") (doc. 33) recommending that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgement and Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgement be denied. Defendant then timely filed objections to the F&R (doc. 35). The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(l)(B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). When either party objects to any portion of a magistrate judge's F&R, the district court must make a de ..
More
ORDER
ANN AIKEN, District Judge.
Magistrate Judge Thomas Coffin filed his Findings and Recommendation ("F&R") (doc. 33) recommending that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgement and Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgement be denied. Defendant then timely filed objections to the F&R (doc. 35). The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). When either party objects to any portion of a magistrate judge's F&R, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the magistrate judge's report. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines, Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981), cert denied, 455 U.S. 920 (1982). Based on my review of the F&R and the documents in the case, I find no error in Judge Coffin's F&R and Defendant's objections do not undermine Judge Coffin's analysis. Thus, I adopt Judge Coffin's F&R (doc. 33) in its entirety. Accordingly, Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgement (doc. 21) and Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgement (doc. 25) are DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
