Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Beverage Dispensing Solutions, LLC v. Thermoplan USA, Inc., 3:18-cv-00603-RCJ-CBC. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20190305593 Visitors: 16
Filed: Feb. 26, 2019
Latest Update: Feb. 26, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT (Second Request) CARLA BALDWIN CARRY , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff BEVERAGE DISPENSING SOLUTIONS, LLC ("BDS") and Defendant THERMOPLAN USA, INC. ("Thermoplan"), by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree that the date for Thermoplan to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint (ECF No. 1) shall be extended from February 24, 2019 to and including March 22, 2019. The extension o
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT

(Second Request)

Plaintiff BEVERAGE DISPENSING SOLUTIONS, LLC ("BDS") and Defendant THERMOPLAN USA, INC. ("Thermoplan"), by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree that the date for Thermoplan to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint (ECF No. 1) shall be extended from February 24, 2019 to and including March 22, 2019.

The extension of time is necessary because the parties appear to have resolved their dispute and require additional time to prepare the settlement documents before a stipulation for dismissal can be filed. The parties represent that this stipulation is made in good faith and not for the purpose of delay. They have previously applied for an extension of time to respond to the Complaint.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer