HINES v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 13-12568. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20140805837
Visitors: 9
Filed: Aug. 04, 2014
Latest Update: Aug. 04, 2014
Summary: ORDER JULIAN ABELE COOK, Jr., District Judge. This case involves a complaint by the Plaintiff, Sonny Hines, who, in relying upon the authority of 42 U.S.C. 405(g), has asked this Court to review a final decision by the Defendant, the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration ("Commissioner"). Thereafter, Hines filed a motion for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. The Commissioner likewise filed a motion for summary judgment. Both motions were forwarded
Summary: ORDER JULIAN ABELE COOK, Jr., District Judge. This case involves a complaint by the Plaintiff, Sonny Hines, who, in relying upon the authority of 42 U.S.C. 405(g), has asked this Court to review a final decision by the Defendant, the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration ("Commissioner"). Thereafter, Hines filed a motion for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. The Commissioner likewise filed a motion for summary judgment. Both motions were forwarded b..
More
ORDER
JULIAN ABELE COOK, Jr., District Judge.
This case involves a complaint by the Plaintiff, Sonny Hines, who, in relying upon the authority of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), has asked this Court to review a final decision by the Defendant, the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration ("Commissioner"). Thereafter, Hines filed a motion for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. The Commissioner likewise filed a motion for summary judgment. Both motions were forwarded by the Court to Magistrate Judge Charles E. Binder for evaluation. In a report on May 22, 2014, the Magistrate Judge recommended that the Court grant the Commissioner's motion for summary judgment.
As of this date, neither party has expressed any objections to the Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation. The period of time for filing objections having now expired, this Court adopts the report, including the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge, in its entirety.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
