Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Strickland v. Godinez, 3:14-cv-962-NJR-DGW. (2016)

Court: District Court, S.D. Illinois Number: infdco20160316a31 Visitors: 24
Filed: Mar. 15, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 15, 2016
Summary: ORDER DONALD G. WILKERSON , Magistrate Judge . Now pending before the Court is the Motion for Extension of Time filed by Plaintiff, Erik Strickland, on February 24, 2016 (Doc. 96). The Motion is GRANTED IN PART. Plaintiff may file his Motion to Compel by April 1, 2016. To the extent that Plaintiff seeks various documents that are "bates stamped 1-135" or otherwise, or an Order dictating law library time, the Motion is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. If Plaintiff served a request to produce
More

ORDER

Now pending before the Court is the Motion for Extension of Time filed by Plaintiff, Erik Strickland, on February 24, 2016 (Doc. 96). The Motion is GRANTED IN PART. Plaintiff may file his Motion to Compel by April 1, 2016. To the extent that Plaintiff seeks various documents that are "bates stamped 1-135" or otherwise, or an Order dictating law library time, the Motion is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. If Plaintiff served a request to produce that was not sufficiently answered, he may file a motion to compel a sufficient answer. To the extent that Plaintiff did not receive documents that are listed as responsive, he should inform Defendants' counsel of the missing documents (by listing the documents that have not been received) and Defendant's counsel SHALL re-serve the document within five (5) business days of receipt of Plaintiff's list. Finally, this Court does not micro-manage the law library at the Lawrence Correctional Center. Plaintiff should request library time through the procedures set forth by the prison. Plaintiff is reminded that if he does seek to compel answers to discovery requests, he should attach the discovery requests and answers to any motion to compel.

Defendants also seek an extension of time to file a Motion for Summary Judgment. The Motion is GRANTED (Doc. 97). Motions for summary judgment are due by April 6, 2016. In light of the extensions of time that have been granted previously, no further extensions will be granted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer