Placer Mining Corporation v. Atlas Mining Group, LLC, 2:18-cv-203-BLW. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Idaho
Number: infdco20181207c70
Visitors: 10
Filed: Dec. 06, 2018
Latest Update: Dec. 06, 2018
Summary: ORDER B. LYNN WINMILL , Chief District Judge . In a prior Order (docket no. 19), the Court discussed the Answer filed by defendant Kelly Holdings, LLC, filed pro se by Richard Kelly who is a "manager and sole member" of the defendant. See Answer (Dkt. No. 12). There is no indication that Mr. Kelly is an attorney licensed to practice in this Court as is required to represent any entity in this Court. See Local Civil Rule 83.4 (b) & (d). Accordingly, the Court ordered that defendant Kel
Summary: ORDER B. LYNN WINMILL , Chief District Judge . In a prior Order (docket no. 19), the Court discussed the Answer filed by defendant Kelly Holdings, LLC, filed pro se by Richard Kelly who is a "manager and sole member" of the defendant. See Answer (Dkt. No. 12). There is no indication that Mr. Kelly is an attorney licensed to practice in this Court as is required to represent any entity in this Court. See Local Civil Rule 83.4 (b) & (d). Accordingly, the Court ordered that defendant Kell..
More
ORDER
B. LYNN WINMILL, Chief District Judge.
In a prior Order (docket no. 19), the Court discussed the Answer filed by defendant Kelly Holdings, LLC, filed pro se by Richard Kelly who is a "manager and sole member" of the defendant. See Answer (Dkt. No. 12). There is no indication that Mr. Kelly is an attorney licensed to practice in this Court as is required to represent any entity in this Court. See Local Civil Rule 83.4 (b) & (d). Accordingly, the Court ordered that defendant Kelly Holdings LLC obtain counsel in compliance with Local Civil Rule 83.4 on or before October 25, 2018, or the Verified Answer (docket no. 12) would be stricken from the record without further notice.
There is nothing in the record indicating that Kelly Holdings LLC has complied with the Court's Order and the deadline has long since expired. Accordingly,
NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the Answer (docket no. 12) is HEREBY STRICKEN from the record.
Source: Leagle
