Filed: Mar. 30, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 30, 2016
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JULIE A. ROBINSON , District Judge . Before the Court is Secretary of State Kris Kobach's Motion for Leave to File under Seal Brief, Exhibits, and Exhibit List in Opposition to Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Doc. 58). 1 In support of his motion, the Secretary asserts that the proposed sealed documents include information marked "Confidential" in the Protective Order. The motion is unopposed. Federal courts "recognize a general right to inspect and copy public rec
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JULIE A. ROBINSON , District Judge . Before the Court is Secretary of State Kris Kobach's Motion for Leave to File under Seal Brief, Exhibits, and Exhibit List in Opposition to Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Doc. 58). 1 In support of his motion, the Secretary asserts that the proposed sealed documents include information marked "Confidential" in the Protective Order. The motion is unopposed. Federal courts "recognize a general right to inspect and copy public reco..
More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JULIE A. ROBINSON, District Judge.
Before the Court is Secretary of State Kris Kobach's Motion for Leave to File under Seal Brief, Exhibits, and Exhibit List in Opposition to Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Doc. 58).1 In support of his motion, the Secretary asserts that the proposed sealed documents include information marked "Confidential" in the Protective Order. The motion is unopposed.
Federal courts "recognize a general right to inspect and copy public records and documents, including judicial records and documents."2 The Court, however, does have "discretionary power to control and seal, if necessary, records and files in its possession."3 "In exercising this discretion, [the court] weigh[s] the interests of the public, which are presumptively paramount, against those advanced by the parties."4 "The Court should seal documents based only on articulable facts known to the Court, and not based on unsupported hypothesis or conjecture."5
Secretary Kobach proposes sealing lengthy documents based on the fact that they include information that is covered by the protective order. This is insufficient under the standard recited above to justify sealing the entire brief and all of the attached exhibits. The Court can discern no confidential information included in the exhibit list. The Court therefore denies this motion without prejudice and suggests the parties review the brief and exhibits, and consider filing a motion for leave to file redacted versions, with the unredacted copies provided separately to the Court; the Clerk's office will then file the unredacted copies as sealed attachments.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED BY THE COURT that Secretary of State Kris Kobach's Motion for Leave to File under Seal Brief, Exhibits, and Exhibit List in Opposition to Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Doc. 58) is denied without prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.