LOECHEL v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 1:14-cv-17. (2015)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20150305b94
Visitors: 87
Filed: Mar. 04, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 04, 2015
Summary: DECISION AND ENTRY: (1) ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 19); AND (2) TERMINATING THIS CASE FROM THE DOCKET TIMOTHY S. BLACK , District Judge . This case is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings filed with this
Summary: DECISION AND ENTRY: (1) ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 19); AND (2) TERMINATING THIS CASE FROM THE DOCKET TIMOTHY S. BLACK , District Judge . This case is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings filed with this ..
More
DECISION AND ENTRY: (1) ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 19); AND (2) TERMINATING THIS CASE FROM THE DOCKET
TIMOTHY S. BLACK, District Judge.
This case is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings filed with this Court, and, on January 26, 2015, submitted a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 19). No objections were filed.
As required by 29 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo all of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does determine that such Report and Recommendation should be and is hereby adopted in its entirety.
Accordingly:
1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 19) is ADOPTED such that the decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED, and this matter is REMANDED pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further administrative proceedings; and
2. This case is TERMINATED on the docket of this Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
