Estep v. Commisioner of Social Security, 1:16cv925. (2018)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20180104e13
Visitors: 1
Filed: Jan. 02, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 02, 2018
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL R. BARRETT , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation filed by the Magistrate Judge on November 30, 2017 (Doc. 22). Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report and Recommendation in a timely manner. United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). No objections to the Magistrate Judge'
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL R. BARRETT , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation filed by the Magistrate Judge on November 30, 2017 (Doc. 22). Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report and Recommendation in a timely manner. United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). No objections to the Magistrate Judge's..
More
ORDER
MICHAEL R. BARRETT, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation filed by the Magistrate Judge on November 30, 2017 (Doc. 22).
Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report and Recommendation in a timely manner. United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). No objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation have been filed.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 22) of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. Plaintiff is awarded the total sum of $3,375.00 in attorney's fees and costs consistent with the Magistrate Judge's recommendation and the parties' Stipulation (Doc. 21).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
