MOORE v. HARRISBURG COMMUNITY UNIT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 3, 13-cv-160-DRH-PMF. (2013)
Court: District Court, S.D. Illinois
Number: infdco20130607b68
Visitors: 10
Filed: Jun. 06, 2013
Latest Update: Jun. 06, 2013
Summary: ORDER DAVID R. HERNDON, Chief District Judge. Before the Court is defendants' motion to dismiss or strike Counts I and II of plaintiff's amended complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted (Doc. 18). Defendants filed their motion on May 1, 2013. Plaintiff's response was due on or before June 3, 2013. As said response date has come and gone, pursuant to LOCAL RULE 7.1(c), the Court deems plaintiff's failure to respond as an admission of the merits of defendants' mot
Summary: ORDER DAVID R. HERNDON, Chief District Judge. Before the Court is defendants' motion to dismiss or strike Counts I and II of plaintiff's amended complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted (Doc. 18). Defendants filed their motion on May 1, 2013. Plaintiff's response was due on or before June 3, 2013. As said response date has come and gone, pursuant to LOCAL RULE 7.1(c), the Court deems plaintiff's failure to respond as an admission of the merits of defendants' moti..
More
ORDER
DAVID R. HERNDON, Chief District Judge.
Before the Court is defendants' motion to dismiss or strike Counts I and II of plaintiff's amended complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted (Doc. 18). Defendants filed their motion on May 1, 2013. Plaintiff's response was due on or before June 3, 2013. As said response date has come and gone, pursuant to LOCAL RULE 7.1(c), the Court deems plaintiff's failure to respond as an admission of the merits of defendants' motion. See SDIL-LR 7.1(c). Accordingly, defendants' motion is GRANTED (Doc. 18). Thus, plaintiff's amended complaint (Doc. 15) is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to respond to defendants' motion and prosecute this action.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
