Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Medrow v. Saul, 17-cv-857. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. Wisconsin Number: infdco20190719d92 Visitors: 2
Filed: Jul. 17, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 17, 2019
Summary: ORDER DAVID E. JONES , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the Court on Defendant's Motion to Enter Judgment, and Remand the Commissioner's Decision for Further Administrative Proceedings, and the Court being duly advised, now grants the motion. It is hereby ORDERED that this case be remanded to the Agency pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. 405(g) for further proceedings and that judgment be entered pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. Upon receipt of the Cour
More

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on Defendant's Motion to Enter Judgment, and Remand the Commissioner's Decision for Further Administrative Proceedings, and the Court being duly advised, now grants the motion.

It is hereby ORDERED that this case be remanded to the Agency pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings and that judgment be entered pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. Upon receipt of the Court's order, the Appeals Council will remand the matter to an Administrative Law Judge to obtain evidence from a psychological or psychiatric medical expert regarding the nature and severity of the claimant's mental impairments for the period from August 6, 2009 through May 18, 2016; reconsider the claimant's residual functional capacity, and in so doing, further evaluate the opinion evidence from the State agency psychological consultants and weigh all opinions pursuant to the requirements of 20 C.F.R. § 404.1527; in assessing the RFC, incorporate the claimant's assessed limitations in concentration, persistence or pace; if warranted, seek supplemental vocational expert evidence to determine if the claimant is capable of performing past relevant work and/or whether there are a significant number of jobs in the national economy that the claimant can perform; if warranted, determine if the claimant's substance use is a contributing factor material to a finding of disability (Social Security Ruling 13-2p); give the claimant an opportunity for a hearing; and issue a new decision.

FootNotes


1. Andrew Saul is now the Commissioner of Social Security and is automatically substituted as a party pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(d). See also section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 USC 405(g) (action survives regardless of any change in the person occupying the office of Commissioner of Social Security).
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer