Lambert v. Commissioner of Social Security, 1:18cv116. (2019)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20190415749
Visitors: 6
Filed: Mar. 12, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 12, 2019
Summary: ORDER SUSAN J. DLOTT , District Judge . This matter is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings and filed with this Court on January 28, 2019 a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 21). Subsequently, the defendant filed objections to such Report and Recommendation (Do
Summary: ORDER SUSAN J. DLOTT , District Judge . This matter is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings and filed with this Court on January 28, 2019 a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 21). Subsequently, the defendant filed objections to such Report and Recommendation (Doc..
More
ORDER
SUSAN J. DLOTT, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings and filed with this Court on January 28, 2019 a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 21). Subsequently, the defendant filed objections to such Report and Recommendation (Doc. 23) and the plaintiff filed a response to the objections (Doc. 24).
The Court has reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo all of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does determine that such Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, the decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED and REMANDED pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. §405(g) consistent with this Order for an award of benefits.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
