JOHN C. COUGHENOUR, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs' motion to approve proposed notice plan and set case schedule (Dkt. No. 124). Having thoroughly considered the parties' briefing and the relevant record, the Court finds oral argument unnecessary and hereby GRANTS the motion for the reasons explained herein.
On February 7, 2017, this Court certified a Class and two Sub-Classes. (Dkt. No. 117.) Plaintiffs now move for approval of their notice plan and to establish a case schedule, with a January 29, 2018 trial date. (Dkt. No. 124 at 2.) Defendant opposes the proposed class notice form because (1) the opt-out period of 45 days is too short, and should be 75 to 90 days; (2) the form does not include a reference to the fact that there is a pending motion for reconsideration of the Ninth Circuit's denial of Defendant's appeal; and (3) the form does not inform putative class members that if they do not opt out, they may be required to respond to discovery requests, attend depositions, or testify at trial. (Dkt. No. 126 at 6-7.) Defendant also opposes the trial date of January 29, 2018, claiming it only agreed to that date on the premise that Plaintiffs go through with the June 2017 mediation, which they did not. (Id. at 5.) Defendant requests a trial date of April 16, 2018. (Id. at 8.)
In their reply, Plaintiffs agreed to a 75 day opt-out period. (Dkt. No. 128 at 4.) The Court otherwise finds Plaintiffs' proposed notice form adequate. The Court will not require Plaintiffs to add information regarding Defendant's motion for reconsideration. It will also not require Plaintiffs to inform putative class members that they may be called upon to participate in discovery or trial, especially when Defendant has not made a showing that limited written discovery, depositions, or trial testimony are necessary. See Newberg on Class Actions §§ 1:5, 9:13, 21:41 (5th ed.).
In addition to the notice plan and case schedule, under Local Civil Rule 39.1(c)(1), the Court ORDERS the parties to engage in mediation by December 31, 2017. The costs of mediation shall be borne equally by the parties unless they agree otherwise.
The Court ORDERS the trial date be set for March 5, 2018 and the following schedule:
For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiffs' motion to approve proposed notice plan and set case schedule (Dkt. No. 124) is GRANTED.