Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

BROWN v. NORTH FLORIDA SURGEONS, 141 So.3d 1292 (2014)

Court: Court of Appeals of Florida Number: inflco20140728346 Visitors: 4
Filed: Jul. 28, 2014
Latest Update: Jul. 28, 2014
Summary: ON REMAND FROM THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT PER CURIAM. In Brown v. North Florida Surgeons, P.A., 110 So.3d 962 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013), we affirmed the trial court's order compelling arbitration. Appellant petitioned the Florida Supreme Court for review, and by order dated June 9, 2014, the Court quashed our decision and remanded for reconsideration upon application of Franks v. Bowers, 116 So.3d 1240 (Fla.2013). We directed the parties to show cause why the trial court's order should not be
More

ON REMAND FROM THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT

PER CURIAM.

In Brown v. North Florida Surgeons, P.A., 110 So.3d 962 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013), we affirmed the trial court's order compelling arbitration. Appellant petitioned the Florida Supreme Court for review, and by order dated June 9, 2014, the Court quashed our decision and remanded for reconsideration upon application of Franks v. Bowers, 116 So.3d 1240 (Fla.2013). We directed the parties to show cause why the trial court's order should not be reversed based upon Franks. The parties agree that reversal is required because the agreement containing the arbitration clause at issue in this case is the same agreement that was invalidated in Franks. Accordingly, the trial court's order compelling arbitration is reversed and this case is remanded for further proceedings.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

VAN NORTWICK, WETHERELL, and ROWE, JJ., concur.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer