Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Balla v. Idaho Board of Correction, 1:81-CV-1165-BLW. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Idaho Number: infdco20191210b73 Visitors: 7
Filed: Dec. 09, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 09, 2019
Summary: ORDER B. LYNN WINMILL , District Judge . The Court's staff held a mediation session with counsel on December 6, 2019, and pursuant to agreement of all counsel had the arguments relayed to the Court for resolution. The Court has decided to deny the plaintiffs' request to communicate with their inmate clients and to authorize inmate demonstrations of daily activities during a site visit of Units 9 & 13 for two reasons. First, the communications and demonstrations will create obvious security
More

ORDER

The Court's staff held a mediation session with counsel on December 6, 2019, and pursuant to agreement of all counsel had the arguments relayed to the Court for resolution. The Court has decided to deny the plaintiffs' request to communicate with their inmate clients and to authorize inmate demonstrations of daily activities during a site visit of Units 9 & 13 for two reasons. First, the communications and demonstrations will create obvious security problems. Second, the communications and demonstrations are essentially an attempt to relitigate the population caps placed on Units 9 & 13, and both sides agree the present caps are not being violated. Accordingly,

NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the plaintiffs' request to communicate with their inmate clients and to authorize inmate demonstrations of daily activities during a site visit to Units 9 & 13 is DENIED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer