Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

BLANC v. POCATELLO WOMEN'S CORRECTIONAL CENTER, 4:09-CV-00121-BLW. (2012)

Court: District Court, D. Idaho Number: infdco20120315996 Visitors: 17
Filed: Mar. 13, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 13, 2012
Summary: ORDER B. LYNN WINMILL, Chief District Judge. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss. (Dkt. 121.) Plaintiff asserts that, notwithstanding the fact that she was granted extensions of time and was notified that the Court could issue subpoenas for her, she disagrees with the Court's earlier decisions not permitting her to proceed with some of her claims and "has further concluded" that to continue her suit under the current circumstances is "pointless." ( Id. ) The Court will gr
More

ORDER

B. LYNN WINMILL, Chief District Judge.

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss. (Dkt. 121.) Plaintiff asserts that, notwithstanding the fact that she was granted extensions of time and was notified that the Court could issue subpoenas for her, she disagrees with the Court's earlier decisions not permitting her to proceed with some of her claims and "has further concluded" that to continue her suit under the current circumstances is "pointless." (Id.) The Court will grant Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss and dismiss her case without prejudice.1 As a result, all other pending motions will be deemed moot.

ORDER

IT IS ORDERED:

1. Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 121) is GRANTED. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice. 2. Defendants' Motion to Strike (Dkt. 117) is MOOT. 3. Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery (Dkt. 115) is MOOT. 4. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 63) is MOOT.

FootNotes


1. While this case will be dismissed without prejudice, the Plaintiff is cautioned that any new suit may be subject to a possible statute of limitations defense.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer