Filed: Nov. 02, 2017
Latest Update: Nov. 02, 2017
Summary: STIPULATED MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINES MARSHA J. PECHMAN , District Judge . Plaintiff Mark Moeglein and Defendant The Prudential Insurance Company of America, by and through their undersigned attorneys, hereby move this Court to extend the deadlines identified in the Case Scheduling Order (Dkt. No. 12.) as follows: Opening briefs on cross-motions due December 3, 2017 Response briefs due January 3, 2018 Reply briefs due January 17, 2018 In support of this motion, the parties state as foll
Summary: STIPULATED MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINES MARSHA J. PECHMAN , District Judge . Plaintiff Mark Moeglein and Defendant The Prudential Insurance Company of America, by and through their undersigned attorneys, hereby move this Court to extend the deadlines identified in the Case Scheduling Order (Dkt. No. 12.) as follows: Opening briefs on cross-motions due December 3, 2017 Response briefs due January 3, 2018 Reply briefs due January 17, 2018 In support of this motion, the parties state as follo..
More
STIPULATED MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINES
MARSHA J. PECHMAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff Mark Moeglein and Defendant The Prudential Insurance Company of America, by and through their undersigned attorneys, hereby move this Court to extend the deadlines identified in the Case Scheduling Order (Dkt. No. 12.) as follows:
Opening briefs on cross-motions due December 3, 2017
Response briefs due January 3, 2018
Reply briefs due January 17, 2018
In support of this motion, the parties state as follows:
1. Plaintiff brings a claim for disability benefits under an employee welfare benefit plan governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. (Dkt. No. 1, passim.)
2. On June 27, 2017, this court entered a case management order that required the parties to file their cross-motions for judgment on the administrative record under Fed. R. Civ. Pro 52 on or before November 3, 2017; Response briefs on or before December 4, 2017, and; Reply briefs on or before December 18, 2017. (Dkt. No. 12.)
3. The parties are in the middle of settlement negotiations and believe those discussions may allow the case to be resolved without further judicial involvement and allow the parties to avoid any unnecessary fees and costs.
4. There are no status conferences, hearings scheduled, or other deadlines that will be affected by this motion.
5. This request is made in good faith and not for the purpose of causing unwarranted delay or any other improper purpose.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED. The parties' stipulated motion is GRANTED.
