HERICKS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 1:10-cv-900. (2012)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20120213758
Visitors: 22
Filed: Feb. 10, 2012
Latest Update: Feb. 10, 2012
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL R. BARRETT, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation ("Report") filed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on January 19, 2012 (Doc. 16). Proper notice has been given to the parties under Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report in a timely manner. (Doc. 16, 22); see United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 , 949-50 (
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL R. BARRETT, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation ("Report") filed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on January 19, 2012 (Doc. 16). Proper notice has been given to the parties under Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report in a timely manner. (Doc. 16, 22); see United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 , 949-50 (6..
More
ORDER
MICHAEL R. BARRETT, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation ("Report") filed by Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman on January 19, 2012 (Doc. 16). Proper notice has been given to the parties under Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report in a timely manner. (Doc. 16, 22); see United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947, 949-50 (6th Cir. 1981). No objection has been filed.
Having reviewed this matter de novo, this Court finds the Report to be correct. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Report is hereby ADOPTED in full. As the Report recommends (Doc. 16, 21), the Commissioner's decision to deny Plaintiff's application for Disability Insurance Benefits and Supplemental Security Income is supported by substantial evidence and is therefore AFFIRMED. As no further matters remain pending for the Court's review, this case is CLOSED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
