DYE v. COLVIN, 1:12-cv-593-SEB-TAB. (2013)
Court: District Court, S.D. Indiana
Number: infdco20130828a58
Visitors: 33
Filed: Aug. 26, 2013
Latest Update: Aug. 26, 2013
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION SARAH EVANS BARKER, District Judge. The Court, having reviewed the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation at Docket No. 28 and observing that no party objected to it within the time permitted under 28 U.S.C. 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), finds said Report and Recommendation is sound and well-reasoned and adopts it as the ruling of this Court. Accordingly, the Commissioner's decision denying Plaintiff's application for So
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION SARAH EVANS BARKER, District Judge. The Court, having reviewed the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation at Docket No. 28 and observing that no party objected to it within the time permitted under 28 U.S.C. 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), finds said Report and Recommendation is sound and well-reasoned and adopts it as the ruling of this Court. Accordingly, the Commissioner's decision denying Plaintiff's application for Soc..
More
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
SARAH EVANS BARKER, District Judge.
The Court, having reviewed the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation at Docket No. 28 and observing that no party objected to it within the time permitted under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), finds said Report and Recommendation is sound and well-reasoned and adopts it as the ruling of this Court.
Accordingly, the Commissioner's decision denying Plaintiff's application for Social Security Supplemental Income is AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
