Elawyers Elawyers

USA v. Reevey, CR417-198. (2018)

Court: District Court, S.D. Georgia Number: infdco20180129883 Visitors: 31
Filed: Jan. 25, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 25, 2018
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION G.R. SMITH , Magistrate Judge . The Court ordered a forensic competency examination of defendant Kevin Reevey after finding reasonable cause to suspect that he is presently suffering from a mental disease or defect rendering him mentally incompetent to stand trial. Doc. 20. After evaluating him at the Metropolitan Correctional Facility in New York, New York, the forensic psychologist concluded that he is competent. Doc. 20 at 13. Defendant and counsel for the part
More

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The Court ordered a forensic competency examination of defendant Kevin Reevey after finding reasonable cause to suspect that he is presently suffering from a mental disease or defect rendering him mentally incompetent to stand trial. Doc. 20. After evaluating him at the Metropolitan Correctional Facility in New York, New York, the forensic psychologist concluded that he is competent. Doc. 20 at 13. Defendant and counsel for the parties have stipulated to the report's findings and conclusions. Doc. 24. It is therefore RECOMMENDED that the defendant be held competent to stand trial.

This Report and Recommendation (R&R) is submitted to the district judge assigned to this action, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and this Court's Local Rule 72.3. Within 14 days of service, any party may file written objections to this R&R with the Court and serve a copy on all parties. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendations." Any request for additional time to file objections should be filed with the Clerk for consideration by the assigned district judge.

After the objections period has ended, the Clerk shall submit this R&R together with any objections to the assigned district judge. The district judge will review the magistrate judge's findings and recommendations pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The parties are advised that failure to timely file objections will result in the waiver of rights on appeal. 11th Cir. R. 3-1; see Symonett v. V.A. Leasing Corp., 648 F. App'x 787, 790 (11th Cir. 2016); Mitchell v. United States, 612 F. App'x 542, 545 (11th Cir. 2015).

SO REPORTED AND RECOMMENDED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer