Tuttle v. Commissioner of Social Security, 16-cv-11144. (2017)
Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20170710a93
Visitors: 12
Filed: Jul. 07, 2017
Latest Update: Jul. 07, 2017
Summary: ORDER (1) ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S JUNE 9, 2017 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF NO. 32), (2) GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT TO THE EXTENT IT SEEKS A REMAND (ECF NO. 24), (3) DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF NO. 28), AND (4) REMANDING FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS UNDER SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. 405(g) PAUL D. BORMAN , District Judge . On June 9, 2017, Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen issued a Report and Recommendation to GRANT Plaintiff's Motion for
Summary: ORDER (1) ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S JUNE 9, 2017 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF NO. 32), (2) GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT TO THE EXTENT IT SEEKS A REMAND (ECF NO. 24), (3) DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF NO. 28), AND (4) REMANDING FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS UNDER SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. 405(g) PAUL D. BORMAN , District Judge . On June 9, 2017, Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen issued a Report and Recommendation to GRANT Plaintiff's Motion for ..
More
ORDER (1) ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S JUNE 9, 2017 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF NO. 32), (2) GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT TO THE EXTENT IT SEEKS A REMAND (ECF NO. 24), (3) DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF NO. 28), AND (4) REMANDING FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS UNDER SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g)
PAUL D. BORMAN, District Judge.
On June 9, 2017, Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen issued a Report and Recommendation to GRANT Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment to the extent it seeks a remand, DENY Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, and REMAND this matter for further administrative proceedings. Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation, and there being no timely objections under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and E.D. Mich L. R. 72.1(d), the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 32), GRANTS Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment to the extent it seeks a remand (ECF No. 24), DENIES Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 28), and REMANDS the matter for further proceedings under Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), consistent with Magistrate Judge Whalen's analysis in his June 9, 2017 Report and Recommendation.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
