ULMER v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 13-14849. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20150127d41
Visitors: 7
Filed: Jan. 26, 2015
Latest Update: Jan. 26, 2015
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION At a session of said Court, held in the U.S. Courthouse, Detroit, Michigan on January 26, 2015 PRESENT: Honorable Gerald E. Rosen Chief Judge, United States District Court GERALD E. ROSEN, Chief District Judge. On September 25, 2014, Magistrate Judge Patricia T. Morris issued a Report and Recommendation ("R & R") recommending that the Court deny Plaintiff Michael Ulmer's motion for summary judgment and grant the Defendant Commiss
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION At a session of said Court, held in the U.S. Courthouse, Detroit, Michigan on January 26, 2015 PRESENT: Honorable Gerald E. Rosen Chief Judge, United States District Court GERALD E. ROSEN, Chief District Judge. On September 25, 2014, Magistrate Judge Patricia T. Morris issued a Report and Recommendation ("R & R") recommending that the Court deny Plaintiff Michael Ulmer's motion for summary judgment and grant the Defendant Commissi..
More
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
At a session of said Court, held in the U.S. Courthouse, Detroit, Michigan on January 26, 2015
PRESENT: Honorable Gerald E. Rosen Chief Judge, United States District Court
GERALD E. ROSEN, Chief District Judge.
On September 25, 2014, Magistrate Judge Patricia T. Morris issued a Report and Recommendation ("R & R") recommending that the Court deny Plaintiff Michael Ulmer's motion for summary judgment and grant the Defendant Commissioner of Social Security's motion for summary judgment. No objections have been filed to the R & R. Upon reviewing the R & R, the parties' underlying cross-motions for summary judgment, and the record as a whole, the Court concurs in the analysis of the Magistrate Judge, and adopts the R & R in its entirety.
Accordingly,
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's September 25, 2014 Report and Recommendation (docket #12) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, for the reasons stated in the R & R, that Plaintiff's March 8, 2014 motion for summary judgment (docket #9) is DENIED, and that Defendant's April 14, 2014 motion for summary judgment (docket #11) is GRANTED.
Source: Leagle
