Hibernation Therapeutics USA, LLC v. Smisson, 5:18-cv-52 (MTT). (2018)
Court: District Court, M.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20180329b73
Visitors: 3
Filed: Mar. 28, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2018
Summary: ORDER MARC T. TREADWELL , District Judge . In evaluating the citizenship of an unincorporated association for the purpose of determining whether the Court has diversity jurisdiction (28 U.S.C. 1332(a)), the Court must consider the citizenship of the association's constituents. 1 In its complaint, Plaintiff Hibernation Therapeutics USA, LLC (HTUSA), a limited liability company, did not sufficiently state the identity and citizenship of its members. See Doc. 1 3 ("Plaintiff Hibernatio
Summary: ORDER MARC T. TREADWELL , District Judge . In evaluating the citizenship of an unincorporated association for the purpose of determining whether the Court has diversity jurisdiction (28 U.S.C. 1332(a)), the Court must consider the citizenship of the association's constituents. 1 In its complaint, Plaintiff Hibernation Therapeutics USA, LLC (HTUSA), a limited liability company, did not sufficiently state the identity and citizenship of its members. See Doc. 1 3 ("Plaintiff Hibernation..
More
ORDER
MARC T. TREADWELL, District Judge.
In evaluating the citizenship of an unincorporated association for the purpose of determining whether the Court has diversity jurisdiction (28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)), the Court must consider the citizenship of the association's constituents.1 In its complaint, Plaintiff Hibernation Therapeutics USA, LLC (HTUSA), a limited liability company, did not sufficiently state the identity and citizenship of its members. See Doc. 1 ¶ 3 ("Plaintiff Hibernation Therapeutics USA, LLC (`HTUSA'), is a limited liability company organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware."). HTUSA's corporate disclosure statement lists the constituent members of HTUSA, most of which are also unincorporated associations with one incorporated entity; however, although providing the states under whose laws those members are created, the disclosure statement does not state all facts necessary to determine the citizenship of those constituent members.2 See generally Doc. 5. Accordingly, the Court hereby ORDERS the Plaintiff to file a supplement to its complaint within 14 days, consisting of one numbered paragraph, that states the facts necessary to determine citizenship of HTUSA and its constituent members. The Defendants need not file a response to such statement unless it contests the assertions of identity and citizenship contained therein.
SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. Underwriters at Lloyd's, London v. Osting-Schwinn, 613 F.3d 1079, 1086 (11th Cir. 2010) ("[U]nincorporated associations do not themselves have any citizenship, but instead must prove the citizenship of each of their members to meet the jurisdictional requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 1332."); see also Carden v. Akoma Assocs., 494 U.S. 185, 195 (1990) (requiring a court to consider the citizenship of all partners of limited partnerships in order to determine whether diversity jurisdiction exists).
2. "If a partner or member of an unincorporated association is itself an unincorporated association, the citizenship of unincorporated associations must be traced through however many layers of partners or members there may be." Orchid Quay, LLC v. Suncor Bristol Bay, LLC, 2016 WL 1404163, at *3 (S.D. Fla.) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The disclosure statement states that constituent members are "Delaware limited liability companies," but the laws under which those members are organized is not determinative of citizenship. See generally Doc. 5. For example, according to the disclosure statement, a constituent of one of HTUSA's constituent members is a corporation and, thus, under 28 U.S.C. § 1332(c)(1), HTUSA is "deemed to be a citizen of every State and foreign state by which [that corporate constituent] has been incorporated and of the State or foreign state where it has its principal place of business."
Source: Leagle
