Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

19-1048 (1971)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Number: 19-1048 Visitors: 20
Filed: Mar. 22, 1971
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 440 F.2d 1355 Harry URVANT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. IMCO POULTRY, INC., as successor in interest to Neuhauser Hatcheries, Inc., as successors in interest to Koppenhofer Brothers Company, a corporation, as successors in interest to Koppenhofer Brothers, a partnership, Defendant-Appellee. No. 468, Docket 35404. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Argued March 8, 1971. Decided March 22, 1971. Harry T. Sherman, New York City (Louis I. Newman, New York City, on the brief), for appellant.
More

440 F.2d 1355

Harry URVANT, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
IMCO POULTRY, INC., as successor in interest to Neuhauser
Hatcheries, Inc., as successors in interest to Koppenhofer
Brothers Company, a corporation, as successors in interest
to Koppenhofer Brothers, a partnership, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 468, Docket 35404.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Argued March 8, 1971.
Decided March 22, 1971.

Harry T. Sherman, New York City (Louis I. Newman, New York City, on the brief), for appellant.

Louis C. Lustenberger, Jr., New York City (Timothy D. Roble, Donovan, Leisure, Newton & Irvine, New York City, on the brief), for appellee.

Before HAYS and FEINBERG, Circuit Judges, and CURTIN, District judge.1

PER CURIAM:

1

We affirm the dismissal of the complaint on the opinion of Judge Dooling below, Urvant v. Imco Poultry, Inc., 325 F. Supp. 677 (E.D.N.Y., filed January 2, 1970).

1

Of the United States District Court for the Western District of New York, sitting by designation

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer