Thorn v. Commissioner of Social Security, 2:14-CV-2402. (2016)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20160223c46
Visitors: 6
Filed: Feb. 22, 2016
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2016
Summary: ORDER ALGENON L. MARBLEY , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. (Doc. 18). On January 25, 2016, the Magistrate Judge issued the Report and Recommendation, recommending that the Commissioner of Social Security's non-disability finding be reversed and remanded under Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g) for further consideration. The Report and Recommendation specifically advises the parties that the failure to object to the Re
Summary: ORDER ALGENON L. MARBLEY , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. (Doc. 18). On January 25, 2016, the Magistrate Judge issued the Report and Recommendation, recommending that the Commissioner of Social Security's non-disability finding be reversed and remanded under Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g) for further consideration. The Report and Recommendation specifically advises the parties that the failure to object to the Rep..
More
ORDER
ALGENON L. MARBLEY, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. (Doc. 18). On January 25, 2016, the Magistrate Judge issued the Report and Recommendation, recommending that the Commissioner of Social Security's non-disability finding be reversed and remanded under Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further consideration. The Report and Recommendation specifically advises the parties that the failure to object to the Report and Recommendation within fourteen days results in "a waiver of the right to de novo review by the District Judge and waiver of the right to appeal the judgment of the District Court." (Doc. 18 at 14). The parties have failed to respond. The deadline for objections has lapsed.
The Court hereby ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation based on the independent consideration of the analysis therein. Accordingly, this action is REMANDED to the Commissioner for further consideration in accordance with this Order, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), Sentence Four.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
