Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

SMITH v. SISTAR BEAUTY CORPORATION, 15 cv-3359. (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. Illinois Number: infdco20160217905 Visitors: 9
Filed: Feb. 15, 2016
Latest Update: Feb. 15, 2016
Summary: AGREED MOTION FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF CLASS AND FOR NOTICE JAMES B. ZAGEL , District Judge . NOW COMES the Plaintiffs and Defendants and hereby move this Honorable Court for Entry of Judgment in Favor of the Class and For Notice. In support thereof, the parties state as follows: 1. On April 16, 2015, Plaintiffs filed their Collective Action And Class Action Complaint. [Dkt. #1, "Complaint"] Plaintiffs alleged claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act (Count I) and the Illinois M
More

AGREED MOTION FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF CLASS AND FOR NOTICE

NOW COMES the Plaintiffs and Defendants and hereby move this Honorable Court for Entry of Judgment in Favor of the Class and For Notice. In support thereof, the parties state as follows:

1. On April 16, 2015, Plaintiffs filed their Collective Action And Class Action Complaint. [Dkt. #1, "Complaint"] Plaintiffs alleged claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act (Count I) and the Illinois Minimum Wage Law (Count II).

2. On April 16, 2015, Plaintiffs also filed a Motion For Certification As A Collective Action And Class Action. [Dkt. #10] On October 27, 2015, the Court certified a Class pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 23(a). [Doc. #43]

3. On September 9, 2015, the Plaintiffs filed a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings pursuant to F.R.C.P. 12(c). [Doc. #74] On October 27, 2015, the Court, by agreement, entered judgment in favor of the Plaintiffs and the Class and against the Defendants for the relief sought in Counts I and II of the Complaint. [Doc. #43] At this time, the Court further ordered the Parties to cooperate to compute the relief that was owed to the Plaintiffs and the Class. [Id.]

4. The Defendants tendered to Class Counsel employment records that purport to show the overtime hours worked by the Plaintiffs and the Class. Based upon these records, counsel for the Defendants and Class Counsel have come to an agreement as to the Defendants' overtime obligations as to each Plaintiff and Class Member. Each Class Member who did not turn in the Opt-In form will receive: (a) 100% of their unpaid overtime compensation owed; plus (b) interest at a rate of 2% per month for every month the overtime was unpaid through March 31, 2016. Each named Plaintiff and Class Member who turned in the Opt-In form will receive: (a) 100% of their unpaid overtime compensation owed; plus (b) liquidated damages equal to the amount of unpaid overtime compensation, plus (c) interest at a rate of 2% per month through March 31, 2016. No attorneys' fees will be taken out of the Class recovery. The parties have prepared a proposed Judgment Order [Exhibit A] that includes an Appendix 1 containing a list of each Class Member and the amount that they will receive (excluding withholdings).

5. In the event that any Class Member chooses to opt out of this class and/or collective action and not receive payment, the Parties have agreed to the attached Notice [Exhibit B] that, upon approval, will be sent to the Class Members by Class Counsel. Class Members will have 30 days to opt out of this case.

6. Each Class Member who does not opt out will be mailed a check by the Defendants on or before March 31, 2016. The payments shall be made by check and mailed via First Class Mail to each Class Member at his or her last known address. By April 28, 2016, Defendants shall provide to the Plaintiffs' Counsel proof of mailing by providing the address and amount of the payment that was sent to each Plaintiff along with a certification, under oath, that the aforementioned payments were made. If any checks are returned for any reason, the Defendants shall provide to the Class Counsel the Plaintiff and/or Class member's last known telephone number. Class Counsel will then attempt to call the Plaintiff and/or Class member to ascertain if an updated address is available. If such an updated address is available, the Defendants will send the check to the new address. On June 1, 2016, Defendants will provide Class Counsel with an accounting of all un-cashed checks by providing a list of all Plaintiffs and Class Members who were sent a check but for which the check was not cashed. At this time, the Defendants will send replacement checks to the Illinois Treasurer Unclaimed Property Division so that the payments are held by the Illinois Treasurer in the name of the individual Plaintiffs and Class Members. Defendants will provide Class Counsel with proof of such actions on or before June 15, 2016.

7. The Parties will cooperate to come to an agreement as to the amount of reasonable attorney fees and costs. If they are unable to do so, then within 90 days, Plaintiffs Counsel shall file a petition for attorney fees and costs.

Wherefore, the parties request that:

(a) The Court authorize the sending of the Class Notice in substantially the form of Exhibit B;

(b) The Court enter the attached Judgment Order; and

(c) For such other relief as this Court deems appropriate.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION SHADIA SMITH, LYNDSY JONES, LaSHEAR ALLEN, JAKIA NEELEY and TSEDKEYAH PITTMAN on behalf of Case No.: 15 cv-3359 themselves and all other plaintiffs similarly situated known and unknown, Plaintiffs, Judge: Honorable James B. Zagel v. SISTAR BEAUTY CORPORATION and SANG W. LEW Magistrate Judge: Honorable Susan E. Cox Defendants.

NOTICE OF MOTION

To: See attached Proof of Service

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on February 18, 2016 at 9:30 a.m., or as soon thereafter as counsel can be heard, I shall appear before the Honorable James B. Zagel in the Dirksen Federal Building, Courtroom 2503, 219 S. Dearborn, Chicago, Illinois and then and there present the attached AGREED MOTION FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF CLASS AND FOR NOTICE and hereby serve upon you a copy of same.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION SHADIA SMITH, LYNDSY JONES, LaSHEAR ALLEN, JAKIA NEELEY and TSEDKEYAH PITTMAN on behalf of Case No.: 15 cv-3359 themselves and all other plaintiffs similarly situated known and unknown, Plaintiffs, Judge: Honorable James B. Zagel v. SISTAR BEAUTY CORPORATION and SANG W. LEW Magistrate Judge: Honorable Susan E. Cox Defendants.

AGREED JUDGMENT

This matter comes before the Court on the Plaintiffs, Shadiya Smith, Lindsy Jones, LaShear Allen, Jakia Neeley, Tsedkeyah Pittman and all other plaintiffs similarly situated ("Plaintiffs") and Defendants Sistar Beauty Corporation ("Sistar") and Sang W. Lew ("Lew," and together with Sistar, collectively "Defendants") Agreed Motion for Entry of Judgment In Favor of Class and For Notice ("Agreed Motion"), the Court being fully advised, it is hereby ordered as follows:

1. Plaintiffs and the Class shall be provided notice in the form attached to the Agreed Motion as Exhibit B by First Class Mail sent by Class Counsel.

2. Judgment is entered against Defendants Sistar Beauty Corporation and Sang W. Lew and in favor of each Plaintiff and Class member in the amount corresponding to that person as set forth on the attached Appendix 1.

3. The amounts set forth on Appendix 1 shall be paid by the Defendants to each Plaintiff and Class members on or before March 31, 2016. The payments shall be made by check and mailed by Defendants via First Class Mail to each Class Member at his or her last known address. By April 28, 2016, Defendants shall provide to the Class Counsel proof of mailing by providing the address and amount of the payment that was sent to each Plaintiff along with a certification, under oath, that the aforementioned payments were made.

4. If any checks are returned for any reason, the Defendants shall within 14 days of receiving the returned check provide to the Class Counsel the Plaintiff and/or Class member's last known telephone number. Class Counsel will then attempt to call the Class member to ascertain if an updated address is available. If such an updated address is available, the Defendants will send the check to the new address.

5. On May 15, 2016, Defendants will provide Class Counsel with an accounting of all un-cashed checks by providing a list of all Plaintiffs and Class Members who were sent a check but for which the check was not cashed. At this time, the Defendants will send replacement checks to the Illinois Treasurer, Unclaimed Property Division so that the payments are held by the Illinois Treasurer in the name of the individual Plaintiffs and Class Member. Defendants shall provide Class Counsel with proof of such actions on or before June 15, 2016.

6. The Parties will cooperate to come to an agreement as to the amount of reasonable attorney fees and costs. If they are unable to do so, then within 90 days, Plaintiffs' Counsel shall file a petition for attorney fees and costs.

7. The Defendants are further ordered to comply with the obligations of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 201, et seq., and the Illinois Minimum Wage Law, 820 ILCS § 105/1, et seq. going forward.

EXHIBIT

Appendix 1—Judgment Amounts

Alishia Johnson $221.65 Antia Getter $63.90 Bianca Chaffin $84.29 Cerel Taylor $34.80 Chenice Yates $730.37 Chicquita Anderson $70.46 Ciara Mckinney $55.79 Conchetta Davis $15.85 Crystal Carton $139.18 Deja Jones $426.69 Diane Foster $16.90 Ebonie Annorh $316.22 Ginesha Belton $0.15 leshia Johnson $3.35 Jacqueline Scott $126.02 Jakia Neeley $1,127.40 Jamie Scott $35.19 Janet Stallworth $995.48 Javon McCain $220.85 Jeoffery Parker $1,937.19 Jovone Shorter $952.53 Kamika Robinson $13.39 Karen Dandridge $1,083.12 Kayla Outten $554.71 Lachina Halmon $608.35 Lashear Allen $294.24 Latoya Scott $455.91 Latrice Williams $13.80 Lena Agnew $9.90 Lyndsy Jones $1,097.67 Marcia Williams $16.20 Mariah Duncan $3.02 Melody Ward $203.82 Patrice Hudson $0.45 Patrick Douglas $176.51 Rachel Kennedy $547.47 Ranasha Scott $508.80 Raquel Robinson $943.28 Raymona Thomas $107.42 Regine Wrightington $12.99 Selena Hammel $27.80 Shadia Smith $884.18 Shaquara Garrett $133.36 Shay $7.30 Sylk Busch $550.35 Tangela Evans $5.80 Tasheaka Gray $17.92 Tsedkeyah Pittman $848.58 Tyisha Cox $619.75 Wavie Murphy $0.60 Whitley Ware $89.15 Yasha Drayton $128.41 Yoshabel Russell $1,903.18

Smith, et al. v. Sistar Beauty Corporation and Sang W. Lew, Case No. 15-cv-3359

NOTICE OF PENDING LAWSUIT February , 2016

1. What is this Notice about?

The Court has authorized this notice. If you were or are an hourly employee of Sistar Beauty Corporation or Sang W. Lew (collectively "Defendants"), work or worked at Defendants' location at 8900 South Lafayette Avenue, Chicago, Illinois, and worked more than forty (40) hours per week, a class action lawsuit may affect your rights.

2. What is the lawsuit about?

The lawsuit is about whether Sistar Beauty Corporation and Sang W. Lew ("Defendants") properly calculated and paid overtime compensation to its employees who worked in excess of forty (40) hours per week. Plaintiffs Lyndsy Jones, Shadia Smith, LaShear Allen, Jakia Neely and Tsedkeyah Pittman (collectively "Plaintiffs") allege that Defendants did not properly calculate hours and overtime wages.

A judgment has already been entered against the Defendants, by agreement, that found that they are liable for overtime wages. Based upon records that were disclosed, the amount of overtime wages owed to the Plaintiffs and other employees has been calculated and you should receive a check for the overtime wages that are owed to you within 60 days if you remain a member of this lawsuit.

3. What is a Class Action Lawsuit and who is involved?

In a class action lawsuit, one or more people called "Class Representatives" sue on behalf of other people who have similar claims. In this case, the Class Representatives are the Plaintiffs. The people with similar claims are a "Class" or "Class Members." The Class Representatives and the Class Members are collectively called the Plaintiffs. The company and people they sued, in this case Sistar Beauty Corporation and Sang W. Lew, are called the Defendants. In a class action lawsuit, one court resolves the issues for everyone in the Class — except for those people who choose to be excluded.

4. Why is this Lawsuit a Class Action?

This lawsuit is both a Collective Action and a Class Action. The Court allowed, or "certified" this lawsuit as a class action because:

a. There are a sufficient number of individuals employed on an hourly basis by Sistar Beauty Corporation and Sang W. Lew;

b. There are legal questions and facts that are common to the Class Members;

c. The Class Representatives' claims are typical to the claims of the rest of the Class;

d. The Class Representatives and the lawyers representing the Class will fairly and adequately represent the Class' interests;

e. Defendants have allegedly acted or refused to act on grounds generally applicable to the Class;

f. There are more important common legal questions and acts in this case than question that affect only individuals; and

g. This class action will be more efficient than having many individual lawsuits.

5. Who will be my lawyers and how will the lawyers be paid?

If you do not exclude yourself from the lawsuit, you will be represented by The Fish Law Firm, P.C. as part of the Class. You do not need to pay the lawyers. The Defendants have agreed to pay the reasonable attorney fees that were incurred by the Plaintiffs' lawyers.

6. How do I ask the Court to exclude me from this Class Action?

To ask to be excluded, you must send a letter to the attorneys for the Class. The letter must be sent to Smith, et al. v. Sistar Beauty Corporation, et al. Exclusions, c/o The Fish Law Firm, 200 E. 5th Avenue, Suite 123, Naperville, Illinois 60563. The letter must state that you want to be excluded from Smith, et al. v. Sistar Beauty Corporation, et al. Be sure to include your full name and address, and be sure to sign the letter. Your letter must be received by the attorneys that represent the Class on or before [30 days from date of mailing], 2016. It is your burden to ensure that your letter is received by the attorneys for the Class by the deadline. Members of the Class who do not elect to be excluded by the date indicated above will not be entitled to elect exclusion from the Class at a later date. Any member of the Class who does not request exclusion may, if the member desires, enter an appearance in this case through the member's own counsel at the member's expense.

7. How do I get more information about the lawsuit?

If you have questions about this Notice or the lawsuit, please contact counsel for the Class: The Fish Law Firm, P.C., 200 E. 5th Ave., Suite 123, Naperville, IL 60563, Phone: 630-355-7590. Copies of the Complaint as well as significant court documents are available on the Internet at: www.fishlawfirm.com/sistarovertimelawsuit/

THIS NOTICE HAS BEEN AUTHORIZED BY THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. PLEASE DO NOT CALL OR WRITE THE JUDGE IN THIS LAWSUIT OR THE CLERK OF THE COURT. NEITHER THE JUDGE NOR THE CLERK OF THE COURT CAN ANSWER QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS LAWSUIT OR THIS NOTICE.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer