Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Sunoco Partners Marketing & Terminals L.P. v. U.S. Venture, Inc., 15 C 8178. (2018)

Court: District Court, N.D. Illinois Number: infdco20181003c98 Visitors: 11
Filed: Sep. 30, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 30, 2018
Summary: ORDER REBECCA R. PALLMEYER , District Judge . For reasons set forth explained in an opinion to be issued before October 5, Plaintiff Sunoco's motion for partial summary judgment [354] is granted. Defendant U.S. Venture's cross motion for partial summary judgment [363] is granted in part, insofar as Venture's systems using Venture's own software and Technics' "Not First Pass" software do not infringe claim 1 of the '671 patent. The motion is otherwise denied. Defendants' motion to seal cer
More

ORDER

For reasons set forth explained in an opinion to be issued before October 5, Plaintiff Sunoco's motion for partial summary judgment [354] is granted. Defendant U.S. Venture's cross motion for partial summary judgment [363] is granted in part, insofar as Venture's systems using Venture's own software and Technics' "Not First Pass" software do not infringe claim 1 of the '671 patent. The motion is otherwise denied.

Defendants' motion to seal certain documents designated as confidential under the terms of the protective order [406] is granted. As both parties have cited the testimony of Norman Goddard on source code issues, Defendants' motion to exclude that testimony [272] is stricken as moot. Defendants' motion to bifurcate and motion to strike the expert disclosure of Rick Rys are trial motions whose disposition may be affected by the court's summary judgment rulings. Accordingly, those motions [268, 377] are stricken without prejudice.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer